10. Lesson Plans from the Roaring 1920's: Immigration Restrictions and Nativism
- Historical Conquest Team
- 15 hours ago
- 36 min read
America After the Great Wave of Immigration
Between the late 1800s and the early 1920s, millions of immigrants arrived in the United States seeking a better life. They crossed oceans, left behind familiar homes, and stepped into a nation that was rapidly becoming one of the world's leading industrial powers. Their arrival transformed cities, strengthened industries, enriched American culture, and sparked debates that would shape the nation's future for generations.
A Nation of New Arrivals
By the late nineteenth century, immigration to the United States had reached levels never seen before. Earlier immigrants had often come from Northern and Western Europe, but now increasing numbers arrived from Southern and Eastern Europe. Italians, Poles, Greeks, Hungarians, Slovaks, Croatians, Russians, and many others entered through ports such as New York City's famous Ellis Island. Many carried little more than a few possessions and a determination to build a better future. For countless families, America represented hope, freedom, and economic opportunity.
Cities Transformed by Immigration
The newcomers helped reshape America's growing cities. Neighborhoods filled with different languages, traditions, foods, and religious practices. In places such as New York, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, and Cleveland, entire communities sprang up where immigrants could find familiar customs from their homelands. Churches, synagogues, newspapers, social clubs, and businesses reflected the rich diversity of these populations. American cities became more vibrant and culturally diverse than ever before, creating a unique mixture of traditions that continues to influence the nation today.
Building America's Industrial Power
Immigrants supplied much of the labor that fueled America's economic growth. They worked in steel mills, coal mines, factories, railroads, construction projects, and shipyards. Their labor helped build skyscrapers, bridges, rail networks, and manufacturing centers that turned the United States into an industrial giant. Many jobs were dangerous, exhausting, and poorly paid, yet immigrant workers persevered because the opportunities available in America often exceeded those in their home countries. Their efforts became a crucial part of the nation's success.
New Cultures, New Traditions
As immigrants settled across the country, they brought traditions that enriched American life. New foods, music, celebrations, art, and religious practices became part of the nation's cultural landscape. Italian pizza, Eastern European foods, Jewish delicatessens, and countless other cultural contributions gradually became familiar parts of American society. While immigrants often adapted to American customs, they also preserved important elements of their heritage, creating a blend of old and new traditions.
Growing Fears and Demands for Limits
Not everyone welcomed these changes. Some Americans worried that the rapid arrival of newcomers was changing the nation too quickly. Concerns grew about jobs, housing, language differences, religion, and cultural traditions. Others feared that immigrants would weaken what they believed were traditional American values. These anxieties became stronger after World War I, when economic uncertainty and social change made many citizens more suspicious of outsiders. As a result, increasing numbers of Americans began supporting laws that would limit immigration.
A Turning Point in American History
The Great Wave of Immigration helped build modern America. Millions of immigrants contributed their labor, ideas, traditions, and determination to a nation that was rapidly growing and changing. Yet their arrival also sparked debates about identity, citizenship, culture, and national unity. Understanding this period helps explain why immigration became one of the most important and controversial issues of the 1920s. It was a time when America had to decide not only who could enter the country, but also what it meant to be an American.
The Rise of Nativism
As millions of immigrants helped build American cities, industries, and communities, many native-born citizens began to wonder whether the nation was changing too quickly. These concerns gave rise to nativism, the belief that people born in the United States should receive special advantages over immigrants and that there should be limitations on the number of immigrants that should be let into the states. The movement influenced politics, immigration laws, and public attitudes, leaving a lasting mark on American history.
A Nation Experiencing Rapid Change
Between the late nineteenth century and the early 1920s, the United States welcomed millions of newcomers from Southern and Eastern Europe. Cities expanded rapidly as immigrants filled factories, mines, railroads, and construction sites. New languages could be heard on city streets, while different foods, customs, and religious traditions became part of everyday life. Although many Americans celebrated this diversity, others viewed these changes with uncertainty and concern.
Fear of Economic Competition
One of the strongest causes of nativism was economic anxiety. Industrial workers often competed for jobs in factories and mines where wages were already low. Some native-born Americans believed that immigrants were willing to work for less pay, making it harder for others to find employment or negotiate higher wages. During times of economic hardship, these fears often increased, causing some citizens to blame immigrants for problems that were usually much more complex.
Concerns About Culture and Identity
Many nativists worried that America's traditional culture was being altered by the arrival of so many European newcomers. Immigrants often maintained their native languages, customs, and religious practices while adapting to life in America. To some citizens, these differences seemed threatening rather than enriching. Questions arose about what it truly meant to be American and whether newcomers would eventually adopt American traditions or preserve their own distinct identities.
Religion and Suspicion
Religious differences also fueled nativist attitudes. Many of the new immigrants were Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, or Jewish rather than Protestant. Some Americans viewed these faiths with suspicion and feared that religious loyalties might conflict with national loyalty. These concerns often reflected misunderstanding and prejudice rather than actual evidence, but they nevertheless influenced public opinion throughout the decade.
The Impact of World War I
World War I strengthened nationalist feelings across the country. During the war, citizens were encouraged to demonstrate loyalty to the United States and support the national cause. After the conflict ended, some Americans became increasingly suspicious of foreign influences. The desire for unity and stability made many people more receptive to arguments that immigration should be limited and that newcomers should quickly adopt American customs.
Fear After World War I
The Great War had united Americans around a common cause, but it had also encouraged citizens to view loyalty and patriotism as matters of national survival. When the fighting ended in 1918, many Americans celebrated victory, yet a growing number also became suspicious of foreigners, immigrants, and people who seemed different from the nation's traditional majority. These fears helped shape public opinion and set the stage for major immigration restrictions during the 1920s.
A Nation Mobilized for War
During World War I, the United States government launched massive campaigns to encourage patriotism and support for the war effort. Citizens were urged to buy war bonds, conserve resources, support soldiers, and display loyalty to the nation. Schools, newspapers, churches, and community organizations promoted unity and national pride. While these efforts helped bring Americans together, they also encouraged some people to become suspicious of anyone whose loyalty appeared uncertain.
Suspicion of Foreign Connections
The war placed particular attention on people who maintained strong ties to foreign countries. Millions of immigrants living in the United States still spoke their native languages and celebrated traditions from their homelands. Although most were loyal Americans or hoped to become citizens, some native-born Americans began to wonder whether newcomers could truly be trusted during a time of international conflict. Communities that had once been viewed simply as immigrant neighborhoods increasingly found themselves under public scrutiny.
The Pressure to Prove Loyalty
Many immigrant families felt pressure to demonstrate their patriotism. Some stopped speaking their native languages in public, changed family names, or emphasized American customs and traditions. German Americans experienced especially intense suspicion during and immediately after the war because Germany had been America's enemy. Schools removed German-language instruction, businesses changed German-sounding names, and many families worked hard to avoid attracting unwanted attention.
National Unity and Cultural Change
The war had convinced many Americans that national unity was essential for security and success. As immigration continued after the conflict, some citizens feared that cultural differences could weaken that unity. New languages, religions, and customs were viewed by some as signs that the nation was becoming too diverse. Rather than seeing immigration as a source of strength, these Americans worried that newcomers might make it more difficult for the country to remain united.
The Search for Stability
The years after World War I brought rapid social, economic, and cultural change. Cities expanded, industries grew, and new technologies transformed daily life. For many Americans, these changes were exciting. For others, they created uncertainty. In times of uncertainty, people often search for simple explanations for complex problems. Immigrants and foreigners sometimes became convenient targets for fears that were actually rooted in broader changes taking place throughout society.
A Lasting Impact on Immigration Policy
The fears that spread after World War I played an important role in shaping the immigration debates of the 1920s. Many Americans supported stricter immigration laws because they believed limits would protect national unity and preserve traditional American culture. These concerns eventually influenced major legislation that reduced immigration from many parts of the world and changed the nation's immigration system for decades.
Understanding Fear After World War I
Fear after World War I demonstrates how national crises can influence public attitudes long after the conflict has ended. The war encouraged patriotism and unity, but it also increased suspicion toward people viewed as outsiders. By studying this period, we can better understand how fear, uncertainty, and rapid change influenced American society and helped shape the immigration policies and national identity debates of the Roaring Twenties.
Cultural Change and Public Anxiety
As millions of immigrants arrived in the United States from Southern and Eastern Europe, they brought with them new languages, customs, foods, music, religious traditions, and ways of life. American cities became more diverse than ever before, creating exciting opportunities for cultural exchange. Yet for many Americans, the speed of these changes created uncertainty and concern, leading some to question how much change the nation could absorb.
A New America Takes Shape
The neighborhoods of major cities began to transform as immigrant communities established homes, businesses, churches, synagogues, and social organizations. Walking through a city street, a person might hear Italian, Polish, Yiddish, Greek, or dozens of other languages. Shops sold foods from around the world, while festivals and celebrations introduced new customs to local communities. These changes made American cities more vibrant and diverse, but they also made the nation look very different from what many native-born citizens had known growing up.
The Challenge of Rapid Change
Change is often easier to accept when it happens slowly. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, however, immigration occurred on a massive scale. Entire neighborhoods seemed to transform within a generation. Many Americans welcomed these developments, but others struggled to adjust. Some feared that traditional customs and values would disappear as new cultures became more visible in public life.
Languages, Traditions, and Identity
One source of anxiety was the continued use of foreign languages and customs. Many immigrant families spoke their native languages at home, read newspapers printed in those languages, and maintained cultural traditions passed down through generations. While immigrants often worked hard to adapt to American society, some citizens worried that newcomers were not becoming "American" quickly enough. Debates emerged over whether immigrants should preserve their heritage or fully adopt American customs.
Religion and Cultural Differences
Religious diversity also increased during this period. Many new immigrants were Catholic, Jewish, or Eastern Orthodox Christians. Their places of worship became important centers of community life, but religious differences sometimes fueled suspicion among Americans who were unfamiliar with these traditions. What some viewed as cultural enrichment, others viewed as evidence that the nation was changing too rapidly.
Fear and the Demand for Restrictions
As cultural changes became more visible, calls for immigration restrictions grew stronger. Some Americans argued that limiting immigration would slow cultural change and help preserve what they considered traditional American values. These concerns were often based more on fear and uncertainty than on actual threats. Nevertheless, public anxiety became a powerful force in politics and helped build support for stricter immigration laws during the 1920s.
The Emergency Quota Act of 1921
For decades, millions of immigrants had entered the United States, helping build factories, railroads, cities, and communities across the nation. By the early 1920s, however, growing concerns about immigration led Congress to take action. The Emergency Quota Act became the first major federal law to place significant numerical limits on immigration, changing the nation's policies and affecting countless families around the world.
A Nation Debates Immigration
Following World War I, many Americans believed that immigration levels had become too high. Concerns about economic competition, cultural change, housing shortages, and national identity filled newspapers and political speeches. Some citizens argued that the nation needed time to absorb the millions of immigrants who had already arrived. Lawmakers faced increasing pressure from voters who wanted stricter controls on who could enter the country.
Creating the Quota System
The Emergency Quota Act introduced a new idea: immigration quotas. Rather than allowing unlimited numbers of immigrants from most countries, the law restricted annual immigration to 3 percent of the number of people from a particular country who were already living in the United States according to the 1910 census. This system gave preference to groups that had been immigrating to America for longer periods while reducing opportunities for many newer immigrant populations.
Who Was Most Affected?
The law had its greatest impact on immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe. Countries such as Italy, Poland, Russia, Greece, and Hungary had sent large numbers of immigrants to the United States during the previous decades. Under the new quota system, many people from these nations faced long waits or were unable to immigrate at all. Meanwhile, immigrants from Northern and Western European countries generally received larger quotas because more people from those regions had already settled in America before the great immigration wave.
Families Divided by New Rules
For many immigrant families, the law created painful challenges. Relatives who hoped to join family members already living in the United States suddenly found that immigration opportunities had become much more limited. Families were separated by oceans and borders, sometimes for years. What had once seemed like an open pathway to America now involved strict regulations and uncertain chances of acceptance.
A Temporary Law with Lasting Consequences
Although lawmakers described the Emergency Quota Act as a temporary measure, it established a precedent for future immigration restrictions. The law demonstrated that the federal government was willing to regulate immigration through numerical limits. Just a few years later, Congress would pass even stricter legislation that further reduced immigration from many parts of the world.
The Immigration Act of 1924
Passed during a period of growing nativism and concern about cultural change, the law dramatically reduced immigration from many parts of the world. Supporters believed it would preserve what they considered traditional American society, while critics argued that it unfairly discriminated against entire groups of people. The law would shape American immigration policy for decades and affect millions of lives both inside and outside the United States.
Building on Earlier Restrictions
The Immigration Act of 1924 did not appear suddenly. It followed years of debate over immigration and expanded upon the restrictions created by the Emergency Quota Act of 1921. Many lawmakers believed that the earlier law had not gone far enough. They wanted a system that would further reduce immigration from regions they considered less desirable while encouraging immigration from countries whose people had settled in America generations earlier.
The National Origins Formula
At the heart of the new law was a national-origins quota system. Instead of basing quotas on the 1910 census, lawmakers used older census data that heavily favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe. Countries such as Great Britain, Germany, and Ireland received much larger quotas, while nations from Southern and Eastern Europe received far fewer immigration opportunities. This formula was specifically designed to influence the future makeup of the American population.
Who Was Favored and Who Was Excluded?
The law favored immigrants from Northern and Western European nations because those groups had established large populations in the United States before the great immigration wave of the late nineteenth century. In contrast, immigrants from Italy, Poland, Greece, Russia, Hungary, and many other countries faced severe restrictions. The law also completely barred immigration from most Asian countries, extending earlier exclusion policies and preventing many families from immigrating to the United States.
Families and Dreams Interrupted
For millions of people around the world, the law closed doors that had once seemed open. Families who hoped to reunite with relatives already living in America often found that immigration had become nearly impossible. People seeking economic opportunity, religious freedom, or a fresh start faced new barriers created not by their abilities or character, but by the country in which they were born.
Why the Law Was Controversial
The Immigration Act of 1924 sparked debate from the moment it was passed. Supporters argued that it would protect American jobs, reduce social tensions, and preserve national unity. Critics contended that the law discriminated against people based on nationality and ethnicity rather than individual merit. Many historians view the law as a reflection of the nativist attitudes and cultural fears that were widespread during the 1920s.
A Law That Lasted for Generations
The effects of the Immigration Act of 1924 extended far beyond the Roaring Twenties. The quota system remained a major feature of American immigration policy for decades and influenced who could enter the country throughout much of the twentieth century. Only in 1965 did Congress replace the national-origins quota system with a different approach to immigration.
Ellis Island and the Changing Immigrant Experience
For millions of immigrants arriving between 1892 and the early 1920s, Ellis Island was the gateway to a new life in the United States. Families crossed oceans dreaming of freedom, jobs, land, and a brighter future. Yet by the 1920s, the experience of immigration was changing dramatically as new laws and quotas made entry into America far more difficult than it had been for earlier generations.
The Gateway to America
Located in New York Harbor, Ellis Island became the busiest immigration station in the United States. More than twelve million immigrants passed through its halls between 1892 and 1954. After often enduring crowded and uncomfortable voyages across the Atlantic Ocean, newcomers caught their first glimpse of the Statue of Liberty and the skyline of New York City. For many, it was an unforgettable moment that symbolized the beginning of a new chapter in life.
Dreams of a Better Future
Most immigrants arriving through Ellis Island came seeking opportunities unavailable in their homelands. Some were escaping poverty, while others fled political unrest, discrimination, or limited economic prospects. Many hoped to find factory jobs, start businesses, purchase land, or reunite with family members who had already settled in America. Despite language barriers and uncertainty, they often arrived with tremendous optimism about what their future might hold.
The Ellis Island Inspection Process
Although Ellis Island represented opportunity, entry was not automatic. Immigrants underwent medical examinations and legal inspections to determine whether they could enter the country. Doctors looked for contagious diseases, while immigration officials asked questions about employment, finances, and personal history. Most immigrants were admitted within a few hours, but some faced additional questioning or, in rare cases, deportation if they failed to meet entry requirements.
A New Era of Restrictions
The atmosphere surrounding immigration changed after World War I. Growing concerns about economic competition, cultural differences, and national identity led many Americans to support stricter immigration controls. Laws such as the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924 sharply reduced the number of immigrants allowed into the country. For many people who hoped to follow relatives to America, the door that had once seemed wide open was now only partially unlocked.
Different Experiences for Different Generations
Earlier immigrants often arrived believing that determination and hard work would give them a chance to build a life in the United States. By the 1920s, however, many prospective immigrants found themselves facing quotas, waiting lists, and restrictions based on their country of origin. Families were sometimes separated for years because immigration laws limited how many people could enter from certain nations. The immigrant journey became more uncertain and far more regulated than it had been during the great immigration wave.
The Lasting Symbol of Ellis Island
Even as immigration restrictions increased, Ellis Island remained one of the most powerful symbols of the American dream. Its buildings witnessed stories of courage, sacrifice, and hope from people seeking a better future. The changing experiences of immigrants during the 1920s reveal how America struggled to balance its tradition as a nation of immigrants with growing concerns about cultural change and national identity.
Americanization Programs
Many government officials, educators, and business leaders believed that helping immigrants learn English, understand American laws, and adopt American customs would strengthen the nation. These programs were designed to help newcomers succeed in their new homeland, but they also sparked debates about identity, culture, and whether immigrants should be expected to give up parts of their heritage in order to become Americans.
Teaching Newcomers to Be Americans
Americanization programs appeared in schools, workplaces, settlement houses, and community organizations across the country. Classes often focused on learning English, understanding American history, and studying the responsibilities of citizenship. Immigrants were taught about voting, government institutions, and civic duties. Supporters believed that these lessons would help newcomers participate fully in American society and improve their chances for economic success.
The Role of Schools
Public schools became some of the most important centers of Americanization. Children of immigrant families learned English, studied American history, and participated in patriotic activities. Teachers often encouraged students to embrace American customs and values while preparing them for life in a rapidly changing nation. For many children, school became the place where they first developed a strong connection to their new country.
Businesses Join the Effort
Large companies also promoted Americanization programs. Factory owners wanted workers who could communicate effectively, understand workplace rules, and cooperate with employees from different backgrounds. Some businesses offered English classes and citizenship courses for workers. A few even held elaborate ceremonies celebrating employees who became American citizens. Employers often viewed these programs as a way to increase productivity and reduce misunderstandings in the workplace.
Benefits for Many Immigrants
For countless immigrants, Americanization programs provided valuable opportunities. Learning English made it easier to find jobs, communicate with neighbors, and navigate daily life. Citizenship classes helped many immigrants become active participants in their communities. These programs often opened doors that might otherwise have remained closed, helping newcomers build successful lives in their adopted country.
Criticism and Cultural Concerns
Not everyone viewed Americanization programs positively. Critics argued that some programs placed too much pressure on immigrants to abandon their native languages, traditions, and cultural identities. Many immigrants believed they could be loyal Americans while still preserving important aspects of their heritage. Some viewed aggressive Americanization efforts as attempts to erase cultural diversity rather than celebrate it.
Balancing Unity and Diversity
The debate over Americanization raised important questions that Americans still discuss today. How can a nation encourage unity while respecting different cultures? How much should newcomers adapt to their new country, and how much should they preserve from their past? These questions had no easy answers in the 1920s, and they continue to spark discussion in modern America.
Religious Prejudice in the 1920s
As millions of immigrants arrived from Southern and Eastern Europe, they brought with them a variety of religious traditions, including Roman Catholicism, Judaism, and Eastern Orthodox Christianity. While the United States was founded on the principle of religious freedom, many Americans viewed these newer religious groups with suspicion. Religious differences became tied to larger debates about immigration, culture, and the question of who could truly be considered "American."
A More Diverse Religious Landscape
For much of American history, Protestant Christianity had been the dominant religious tradition in many parts of the country. The great wave of immigration changed this reality. New churches, synagogues, and religious schools appeared in cities and towns across the nation. Catholic parishes grew rapidly, Jewish communities expanded, and immigrants brought traditions that enriched American religious life. For many Americans, this diversity was a sign of freedom and opportunity. For others, it created uncertainty and concern.
Suspicion Toward Catholics
Many Catholics faced discrimination during the 1920s. Some critics falsely claimed that Catholics would place loyalty to the Pope above loyalty to the United States. Others worried that Catholic schools and institutions would prevent immigrants from fully adopting American values. These fears often ignored the fact that millions of Catholic immigrants worked, served in the military, voted, and contributed to their communities just like other Americans. Nevertheless, anti-Catholic attitudes remained widespread in certain regions of the country.
Challenges Faced by Jewish Americans
Jewish immigrants and Jewish American families also encountered prejudice. Many had fled persecution in Europe only to face discrimination in housing, employment, education, and social organizations in the United States. Some colleges established informal quotas limiting the number of Jewish students they would admit. Harmful stereotypes and conspiracy theories spread through newspapers, organizations, and public discussions, creating barriers that Jewish Americans had to overcome.
Mormon Immigration and Public Suspicion
Tens of thousands of converts to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints immigrated to the United States from Great Britain, Scandinavia, and other European countries. Church leaders actively encouraged converts to gather with fellow believers in the American West, particularly in Utah, creating one of the largest organized religious migration movements in American history. To many Americans, the steady arrival of large numbers of Mormon immigrants raised concerns similar to those directed toward other immigrant groups. Critics worried that these newcomers would remain more loyal to their church and communities than to the broader nation. Their distinctive religious beliefs, close-knit settlements, and growing political influence fueled suspicion among some Americans who feared that Mormon immigration was creating a separate society within the United States in the west.
The Influence of Nativism
Religious prejudice often overlapped with the growing nativist movement of the 1920s. Critics of immigration sometimes argued that certain religious groups were less capable of becoming loyal Americans. Religious differences became another reason used to justify restrictions on immigration and to question whether newcomers truly belonged in American society. These arguments frequently reflected fear and misunderstanding rather than evidence or reality.
The Ku Klux Klan and Religious Intolerance
The revived Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s targeted more than just racial minorities. The organization openly attacked Catholics, Jews, immigrants, and others whom it viewed as threats to its vision of America. The Klan claimed to defend traditional American values, but its campaigns often promoted intolerance, division, and discrimination. Its popularity during parts of the decade revealed how widespread religious prejudice had become.
Defining Who Was “Truly American”
At the center of many debates was a larger question: What did it mean to be American? Some people argued that being American required belonging to a particular religion or cultural background. Others believed that loyalty to the Constitution, participation in civic life, and respect for democratic principles mattered far more than religious affiliation. These competing viewpoints shaped public discussions throughout the decade.
Border Control and Immigration Enforcement
For much of the nation's history, immigration laws were relatively limited, and millions of newcomers entered the country with few restrictions. By the 1920s, however, concerns about immigration, national security, and cultural change led the federal government to take a much larger role in monitoring borders and enforcing immigration laws. These efforts laid the foundation for many of the systems that continue to exist today.
An Open Nation Becomes More Regulated
During the nineteenth century, the United States experienced massive waves of immigration. While some restrictions existed, the federal government had only a modest role in controlling who entered the country. As immigration numbers increased and public debates intensified, lawmakers began creating new laws designed to limit and regulate immigration. Each new law required greater government involvement, creating a growing bureaucracy dedicated to enforcing immigration policies.
The Challenge of a Vast Border
The United States possessed thousands of miles of land and coastline, making immigration enforcement a difficult task. Officials had to monitor major ports, border crossings, and remote regions where people could enter without inspection. While Ellis Island became famous for processing immigrants arriving by sea, government officials also became increasingly concerned about monitoring the nation's land borders with Canada and Mexico.
New Laws Require New Enforcement
The Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924 created numerical limits on immigration from many countries. These laws could only succeed if the government had systems in place to track arrivals and ensure that quotas were followed. Immigration inspectors, customs officials, and other federal employees became responsible for reviewing documents, verifying identities, and enforcing increasingly complex immigration regulations.
The Birth of the Border Patrol
One of the most significant developments came in 1924 with the creation of the United States Border Patrol. Congress established this new agency to help prevent unauthorized crossings and enforce immigration laws along the nation's borders. Early Border Patrol agents often worked in difficult conditions, traveling long distances through deserts, mountains, forests, and isolated regions. Their mission reflected the growing belief that immigration enforcement should be a permanent responsibility of the federal government.
Balancing Security and Opportunity
Supporters of stronger border enforcement argued that immigration laws would be meaningless without effective enforcement. They believed that monitoring borders helped maintain order and ensured that immigration policies were applied fairly. Critics, however, worried that increased enforcement could create hardships for immigrants and families seeking lawful opportunities in the United States. These debates would continue for decades and remain important issues today.
Technology and Record Keeping
As immigration enforcement expanded, officials developed better systems for record keeping, identification, and inspections. Passenger manifests, immigration records, photographs, and official documents became increasingly important tools for tracking immigration. These early efforts represented some of the first steps toward the modern systems used by immigration authorities today.
The Sacco and Vanzetti Trial
During the 1920s, a decade marked by immigration debates, political tensions, and growing nativism, two Italian immigrants found themselves at the center of a legal battle that captured international attention. Even more than a century later, historians continue to debate whether Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti received a fair trial or whether anti-immigrant prejudice influenced the outcome of their case.
A Crime That Shocked Massachusetts
On April 15, 1920, two men carrying a company's payroll were robbed and shot to death in South Braintree, Massachusetts. The crime stunned the local community and launched an intense investigation. Police searched for suspects and eventually focused on Sacco and Vanzetti, two Italian immigrants who were known to hold anarchist political beliefs. Their arrest quickly transformed the case from a local murder investigation into a national controversy.
Who Were Sacco and Vanzetti?
Nicola Sacco was a skilled shoe factory worker, while Bartolomeo Vanzetti worked various jobs, including selling fish. Both men had immigrated from Italy and were supporters of anarchism, a political philosophy that opposed many forms of government authority. At a time when many Americans feared radical political movements and viewed immigrants with suspicion, their backgrounds became a major part of the public discussion surrounding the case.
The Trial and the Evidence
The trial began in 1921 and included witness testimony, ballistic evidence, and arguments from both prosecutors and defense attorneys. Prosecutors claimed the evidence linked the men directly to the robbery and murders. The defense challenged the reliability of some witnesses and argued that important evidence raised doubts about their guilt. As the trial unfolded, observers disagreed sharply about the strength of the evidence and whether the defendants were being judged fairly.
Public Reaction Around the World
The verdict sparked enormous public interest. After Sacco and Vanzetti were found guilty and sentenced to death, supporters organized protests across the United States and around the world. Writers, scholars, labor leaders, and political activists questioned the fairness of the proceedings. Demonstrations took place in major cities, and newspapers published passionate arguments both defending and criticizing the verdict. Few criminal trials of the era attracted such widespread attention.
The Question of Prejudice
One of the central debates surrounding the case involved prejudice against immigrants. Many critics believed that Sacco and Vanzetti's Italian heritage, political beliefs, and immigrant status influenced how they were treated by authorities and the courts. Others argued that the verdict was based primarily on evidence presented during the trial. This disagreement became one of the most enduring aspects of the case and remains the focus of historical discussion today.
Execution and Lasting Controversy
After years of appeals, Sacco and Vanzetti were executed in 1927. Their deaths intensified public debate rather than ending it. Decades later, new studies, books, and investigations continued to examine the evidence and question whether justice had been served. In 1977, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis issued a proclamation acknowledging that the trial and its aftermath had raised serious questions about fairness and prejudice.
Why the Case Still Matters
The Sacco and Vanzetti Trial remains important because it raises questions about justice, evidence, public opinion, and the treatment of immigrants. It reminds us that court cases do not occur in isolation but are often influenced by the fears, beliefs, and tensions of their time. By studying this famous trial, students gain insight into the challenges of ensuring fairness in a society experiencing rapid change and intense debate over immigration and national identity.
Defining What It Meant to Be American
As millions of immigrants arrived in the United States and communities became more diverse, Americans found themselves asking difficult questions about citizenship, loyalty, language, culture, and national identity. Some believed that newcomers should completely adopt American customs and traditions, while others argued that people could remain proud of their cultural heritage while still being loyal Americans. These debates shaped immigration policies, public attitudes, and the nation's understanding of itself.
A Nation Built by Immigrants
The United States had long been a nation shaped by immigration. People from many different countries had helped build farms, cities, industries, and communities across the continent. By the early twentieth century, however, immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe brought new languages, religions, and customs that differed from those of many earlier immigrants. The rapid pace of change caused some Americans to question whether the nation's identity was evolving too quickly.
Citizenship and Loyalty
One major question centered on loyalty. Many Americans believed that citizenship carried responsibilities such as obeying laws, participating in civic life, and supporting the nation during times of crisis. Yet some people wondered whether immigrants who spoke other languages or maintained strong ties to their ancestral homelands could be fully loyal to the United States. Immigrants themselves often responded by serving in the military, becoming citizens, voting, and contributing to their communities, demonstrating their commitment to their adopted country.
The Debate Over Language
Language became another important issue. Supporters of Americanization believed that learning English was essential for success and national unity. They argued that a common language helped citizens communicate and participate in democracy. Others agreed that English was important but believed immigrants should also be free to preserve their native languages and pass them on to future generations. This debate reflected larger questions about cultural identity and belonging.
The Melting Pot Idea
Many Americans embraced the idea of the United States as a "melting pot." According to this view, people from different backgrounds would gradually blend together into a single American culture. Supporters believed this process would strengthen national unity and create a common identity shared by all citizens. The melting pot became one of the most influential ideas about immigration and assimilation during the early twentieth century.
The Value of Cultural Diversity
Not everyone agreed with the melting pot concept. Some believed America was strongest when people preserved elements of their cultural heritage while contributing to the larger society. They argued that different traditions, foods, music, languages, and customs enriched the nation rather than weakened it. This perspective suggested that Americans did not need to abandon their roots in order to be loyal citizens.
A Nation Divided on Identity
The debates of the 1920s often became heated because they touched on fundamental questions about the future of the country. Should America encourage cultural uniformity or celebrate diversity? Should immigrants be expected to change quickly, or should cultural differences be welcomed? These questions influenced public policy, education, and immigration laws throughout the decade.
Voices Against Restriction
While many Americans supported stricter immigration laws, millions of others opposed those restrictions. Religious leaders, business owners, journalists, educators, civic organizations, and immigrant communities spoke out against policies that limited immigration. Their efforts reveal that the nation was deeply divided over questions of fairness, opportunity, and what kind of country the United States should become.
Immigrant Communities Speak Out
Many of the strongest voices against immigration restrictions came from immigrant communities themselves. Families who had built lives in America wanted relatives to have the same opportunities they had enjoyed. Community organizations, ethnic newspapers, and civic leaders argued that newcomers strengthened the nation through hard work, entrepreneurship, and cultural contributions. They viewed restrictive laws as barriers that separated families and unfairly targeted people based on their birthplace.
Religious Leaders Defend Newcomers
Religious leaders from many faith traditions opposed restrictive immigration policies. Catholic bishops, Jewish rabbis, Protestant ministers, and other clergy often argued that immigrants deserved compassion and fair treatment. Many pointed to religious teachings that emphasized helping strangers and welcoming those seeking safety and opportunity. They warned that prejudice and discrimination could undermine the nation's commitment to liberty and justice.
Business Leaders and Economic Growth
Many business owners opposed strict immigration limits because they relied on immigrant labor. America's factories, mines, railroads, farms, and construction projects had long depended on workers from around the world. Business leaders argued that immigrants helped fuel economic growth, fill labor shortages, and expand industries. They believed that restricting immigration too severely could slow the nation's economic progress and reduce opportunities for future development.
Journalists and Public Debate
Newspapers and journalists played an important role in challenging immigration restrictions. Editorial writers questioned whether quotas were fair and whether nationality should determine a person's opportunity to enter the country. Some reporters highlighted the achievements of immigrants who had become successful business owners, workers, soldiers, and citizens. Through articles and public discussions, journalists encouraged Americans to consider multiple perspectives rather than accepting a single viewpoint.
Defending American Ideals
Many opponents of restriction believed that immigration was closely tied to America's identity. They argued that the United States had been built by generations of immigrants seeking freedom and opportunity. To these critics, restrictive laws seemed inconsistent with the nation's history and values. They believed that America should remain a place where people from different backgrounds could pursue a better future.
A Debate Without Easy Answers
Not everyone who opposed immigration restrictions agreed on every issue. Some favored moderate limits while opposing harsh quotas. Others believed immigration should remain largely unrestricted. This variety of opinions demonstrates that the debate was not simply between two opposing sides but included many viewpoints shaped by economics, religion, personal experience, and political beliefs.
The Long-Term Impact of Immigration Restrictions
The immigration laws passed during the 1920s were intended to reduce immigration from certain regions of the world and preserve what supporters considered the nation's traditional character. While these laws addressed concerns held by many Americans at the time, they also produced consequences that lasted for decades. Their influence can be traced through changing immigration patterns, family histories, economic development, and ongoing debates about who should be allowed to enter the United States.
Changing the Flow of Immigration
Before the 1920s, millions of immigrants arrived from Southern and Eastern Europe. The quota laws of 1921 and 1924 dramatically reduced immigration from these regions while favoring immigrants from Northern and Western Europe. As a result, the composition of new arrivals changed significantly. Entire communities that might have continued growing through immigration saw their numbers limited, altering the demographic development of many American cities and regions.
Families Separated by Quotas
One of the most personal effects of immigration restrictions involved family reunification. Many immigrants who had already settled in the United States hoped to bring parents, siblings, spouses, or children to join them. Quota limits often delayed or prevented these reunions. For some families, separation lasted years or even decades. The emotional impact of these restrictions became part of countless family stories passed down through generations.
Economic Consequences
Immigration had long provided workers for farms, factories, railroads, mines, and construction projects. When immigration declined, some industries found it more difficult to recruit labor. While technological advances and internal migration helped fill some gaps, business leaders often argued that immigration restrictions limited the nation's economic flexibility. The debate over how immigration affects economic growth remains an important issue in modern discussions.
Shaping America's Diversity
The quota system influenced who could become part of the American population for much of the twentieth century. By favoring some regions and limiting others, the laws helped shape the cultural, ethnic, and religious makeup of the nation. Historians often note that these policies affected not only the people who were excluded but also the communities that might have been formed had immigration remained less restricted.
The End of the Quota Era
For more than forty years, the national-origins quota system remained a central feature of American immigration policy. In 1965, Congress passed new legislation that replaced the quota system with different criteria, including family reunification and employment-based immigration. This change reopened immigration opportunities for people from many parts of the world and ushered in a new era of immigration history.
Debates That Continue Today
Many of the questions raised during the 1920s remain part of public discussion today. Americans continue to debate border security, immigration levels, economic impacts, cultural change, and national identity. While the circumstances have changed, the core issues are often similar to those discussed nearly a century ago. Understanding the policies of the 1920s helps explain why immigration remains one of the most important and frequently debated topics in American politics.
World Events That Influenced Immigration Restrictions and Nativism (1920s)
World War I and Its Aftermath (1914–1918)
The First World War devastated much of Europe, killing millions and leaving entire regions economically shattered. When the war ended, many Europeans sought better opportunities abroad, including in the United States. At the same time, wartime propaganda had encouraged Americans to be highly patriotic and suspicious of foreign influences. This combination of increased migration and heightened nationalism helped fuel support for immigration restrictions.
The Russian Revolution and Soviet Communism (1917–1922)
The Russian Revolution overthrew the Russian Empire and led to the creation of the Soviet Union. The rise of a communist government alarmed many Americans, who feared that revolutionary ideas might spread to the United States. Although most immigrants were not radicals, some Americans associated immigrants from Eastern Europe with political extremism. This fear contributed to growing support for tighter immigration controls.
The Russian Civil War and Refugee Crisis (1917–1923)
Following the revolution, Russia experienced a brutal civil war that displaced millions of people. Refugees fled violence, famine, and political persecution. Some hoped to immigrate to the United States. The arrival of refugees increased public discussions about immigration and reinforced concerns among those who believed America should limit the number of newcomers entering the country.
The Collapse of European Empires (1918–1923)
The end of World War I led to the collapse of the German, Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman, and Russian Empires. New countries appeared across Europe, and shifting borders created political instability. Ethnic conflicts, economic hardship, and uncertainty encouraged many people to seek opportunities elsewhere. Americans watched these developments closely and debated whether the United States should continue accepting large numbers of immigrants from these troubled regions.
Economic Hardships in Europe
Much of Europe struggled economically after World War I. Inflation, unemployment, housing shortages, and damaged infrastructure made life difficult for millions. As more people considered emigrating to America, some Americans worried that continued immigration would increase competition for jobs and housing. These concerns became a major argument used by supporters of immigration quotas.
The Armenian Genocide and Refugee Movements
The destruction and displacement of Armenians during and after World War I created a humanitarian crisis that became known around the world. Relief organizations worked to assist refugees, and many Americans became aware of the suffering occurring overseas. While some citizens supported helping refugees, others argued that the United States could not absorb every group seeking safety, contributing to debates over immigration policy.
The Rise of Nationalism Around the World
The 1920s witnessed growing nationalism in many countries. New nations emerged in Europe, while leaders across the world emphasized loyalty, national identity, and cultural unity. These global trends influenced American thinking as well. Many citizens began asking what it meant to be American and whether immigrants should fully adopt American customs and traditions.
Japanese and Asian Immigration Debates
Immigration from Asia had already become controversial before the 1920s. International discussions involving Japan and immigration policies on the American West Coast attracted national attention. The Immigration Act of 1924 effectively barred immigration from most Asian countries, creating diplomatic tensions and demonstrating how global relationships influenced American immigration decisions.
The Mexican Revolution and Cross-Border Migration
The Mexican Revolution, which began in 1910, caused instability and economic disruption for many years. Large numbers of Mexicans crossed the border seeking safety and employment. Their arrival highlighted the growing importance of border enforcement and influenced discussions about how immigration laws should be applied to America's southern border.
The Rise of Fascism in Italy (1922)
When Benito Mussolini and the Fascist Party gained power in Italy in 1922, Americans closely followed developments there. Political turmoil in Italy encouraged some Italians to seek opportunities abroad. At the same time, Americans already debating immigration often viewed immigrants from Southern Europe through the lens of international political events, increasing suspicion toward certain immigrant groups.
The Most Important People During Immigration Restrictions and Nativism (1920s)
Albert Johnson – Architect of Restrictive Immigration Laws
Albert Johnson served as a congressman from Washington and became one of the leading supporters of immigration restriction. As chairman of the House Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, he helped draft and promote the Immigration Act of 1924. Johnson believed that limiting immigration would protect American society and preserve national unity. His influence helped shape immigration policy for decades.
David Reed – Co-Author of the Immigration Act of 1924
David A. Reed was a senator from Pennsylvania and one of the principal architects of the Immigration Act of 1924. Reed supported the national-origins quota system that favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe while limiting immigration from other regions. His work made him one of the most influential lawmakers in the immigration debate of the 1920s.
Nicola Sacco – Symbol of Immigrant Rights
Nicola Sacco was an Italian immigrant whose trial for robbery and murder became an international controversy. Although historians continue to debate aspects of the case, Sacco became a symbol for many people who believed immigrants faced prejudice within the American legal system. His story helped bring worldwide attention to concerns about discrimination against immigrants.
Bartolomeo Vanzetti – A Voice in a Famous Controversy
Bartolomeo Vanzetti was Sacco's co-defendant and fellow Italian immigrant. His eloquent courtroom statements and public defense attracted sympathy from supporters around the world. Vanzetti became one of the most recognizable figures associated with debates over fairness, justice, and anti-immigrant prejudice in the United States.
Frances Perkins – Defender of Immigrants and Workers
Frances Perkins was a reformer who advocated for workers, immigrants, and social justice. Although she would become most famous during the New Deal era, Perkins spoke against discrimination and supported policies that treated immigrants fairly. Her work represented a growing movement that challenged exclusionary attitudes and promoted equal opportunity.
Grace Abbott – Champion for New Americans
Grace Abbott dedicated much of her career to helping immigrants adjust to life in the United States. Working through settlement houses and government agencies, she promoted education, child welfare, and assistance for immigrant families. Abbott believed that immigrants strengthened America and deserved fair treatment and opportunities for success.
Jane Addams – Continuing Advocate for Immigrant Communities
Although her greatest fame came before the 1920s, Jane Addams remained an influential voice during this period. Through Hull House in Chicago, she helped immigrant families find education, employment assistance, and community support. Addams challenged prejudice and encouraged Americans to view immigrants as valuable contributors to society.
Louis Marshall – Defender of Religious Liberty
Louis Marshall was one of the leading Jewish voices in America during the 1920s. He fought against anti-Semitism, discrimination, and restrictive immigration policies. Marshall argued that religious freedom and equal treatment were essential American values and worked to protect the rights of minority communities.
Hiram Wesley Evans – Leader of the Revived Ku Klux Klan
Hiram Wesley Evans became the national leader of the Ku Klux Klan during its resurgence in the 1920s. Evans promoted nativist, anti-immigrant, anti-Catholic, and anti-Jewish beliefs. While controversial, he was highly influential because the Klan attracted millions of members during the decade and helped spread support for restrictive immigration policies.
Life Lessons from Studying Immigration Restrictions and Nativism (1920s)
Fear Can Be a Powerful Motivator
One of the most important lessons from this period is that fear often influences decisions. Many Americans feared economic competition, cultural change, political instability, and unfamiliar traditions. Some of these concerns were sincere, while others were based on misunderstandings or stereotypes. The lesson is not that people should never be concerned about change, but that decisions made primarily from fear can sometimes lead to unintended consequences. Wise decision-making requires facts, evidence, and careful analysis rather than emotional reactions alone.
People Often Judge What They Do Not Yet Understand
The arrival of immigrants brought new languages, religions, foods, and customs to American communities. Many people welcomed these differences, but others viewed them with suspicion because they were unfamiliar. This teaches an important lesson: humans naturally feel more comfortable with what they know. However, growth often comes from learning about people and ideas that are different from our own experiences. Understanding usually reduces fear, while ignorance often increases it.
Complex Problems Rarely Have Simple Answers
The immigration debates of the 1920s involved economics, national security, culture, labor markets, housing, education, and politics. There was no single solution that satisfied everyone. Students can learn that many important issues are complicated and require balancing multiple concerns. Good leaders and thoughtful citizens avoid simple answers to complex problems and instead seek to understand all sides of an issue before making decisions.
A Nation Can Be United Without Everyone Being Identical
One of the central questions of the era was whether immigrants needed to abandon their cultural heritage in order to become Americans. The debate reminds us that unity does not always require uniformity. People can share common values, laws, and goals while maintaining different traditions, languages, and backgrounds. Strong communities often find ways to balance shared identity with individual diversity.
Individual Actions Affect Future Generations
The immigration laws of the 1920s affected millions of people for decades. Families were separated, immigration patterns changed, and entire communities developed differently because of decisions made by lawmakers and voters. This teaches the importance of thinking beyond immediate results. Decisions made today may influence future generations in ways that are impossible to fully predict.
Vocabulary to Learn While Studying Immigration Restrictions and Nativism
1. Nativism
Definition: The belief that native-born citizens should be favored over immigrants in jobs, politics, and society.
Sample Sentence: Nativism grew stronger during the 1920s as some Americans worried about the large number of immigrants entering the country.
2. Immigration
Definition: The movement of people from one country to another to live permanently.
Sample Sentence: Immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe changed many American cities during the early twentieth century.
3. Immigrant
Definition: A person who moves to another country to live there permanently.
Sample Sentence: The immigrant arrived at Ellis Island hoping to find work and a better future.
4. Assimilation
Definition: The process by which immigrants adopt the customs, language, and culture of their new country.
Sample Sentence: Some Americans believed assimilation was necessary for immigrants to become part of American society.
5. Americanization
Definition: Programs designed to teach immigrants English, citizenship, and American customs.
Sample Sentence: Many factories offered Americanization classes to help immigrant workers learn English.
6. Citizenship
Definition: The legal status of being a member of a country with certain rights and responsibilities.
Sample Sentence: After several years in the United States, the immigrant applied for citizenship.
7. Naturalization
Definition: The legal process through which an immigrant becomes a citizen of a new country.
Sample Sentence: Naturalization allowed many immigrants to vote and participate fully in American civic life.
8. Ellis Island
Definition: The primary immigration processing station in New York Harbor from 1892 to 1954.
Sample Sentence: Millions of immigrants passed through Ellis Island before entering the United States.
9. Prejudice
Definition: An unfair opinion about a person or group that is formed without proper knowledge or evidence.
Sample Sentence: Prejudice against certain immigrant groups contributed to support for restrictive immigration laws.
10. Discrimination
Definition: Unfair treatment of people because of their background, religion, ethnicity, or other characteristics.
Sample Sentence: Many immigrants faced discrimination when applying for jobs and housing.
11. Deportation
Definition: The removal of a non-citizen from a country by government authorities.
Sample Sentence: Some immigrants feared deportation if they violated immigration laws.
12. Border Patrol
Definition: A federal law enforcement agency responsible for monitoring and protecting the nation's borders.
Sample Sentence: The Border Patrol was established in 1924 to help enforce immigration laws.
13. Patriotism
Definition: Love, loyalty, and support for one's country.
Sample Sentence: Many Americans emphasized patriotism during and after World War I.
14. National Identity
Definition: The shared beliefs, culture, and values that help define a nation and its people.
Sample Sentence: Debates about immigration often centered on questions of national identity.
15. Cultural Diversity
Definition: The presence of many different cultural groups within a society.
Sample Sentence: Cultural diversity increased as immigrants brought new traditions and customs to America.
16. Anarchist
Definition: A person who believes that governments should be abolished or greatly limited.
Sample Sentence: The political beliefs of Sacco and Vanzetti became an important part of their trial.
17. Refugee
Definition: A person who leaves their country because of war, persecution, or disaster.
Sample Sentence: Many refugees hoped to find safety and opportunity in the United States.
18. Melting Pot
Definition: The idea that people from different cultures blend together to form a single national culture.
Sample Sentence: Some Americans viewed the United States as a melting pot where immigrants would eventually adopt common traditions.
Activities to Try While Studying Immigration Restrictions and Nativism
Ellis Island Immigration Simulation
Recommended Age: 9–14
Activity Description: Students participate in a simulated Ellis Island experience. Each student receives an immigrant identity card with information about their country of origin, occupation, age, and reason for coming to America. Students move through inspection stations where they answer questions, complete simple tasks, and experience the immigration process faced by millions of newcomers.
Objective: To help students understand the hopes, challenges, and emotions experienced by immigrants arriving in America.
Materials: Index cards, pencils, country information sheets, stamps or stickers, tables for inspection stations.
Instructions:
Create immigrant identity cards for each student.
Set up stations representing medical inspections, legal inspections, and citizenship questions.
Have students travel through the stations while teachers or parents act as immigration officials.
Discuss how students felt during the process and compare their experiences to historical accounts.
Review how immigration restrictions later changed the experience for newcomers.
Learning Outcome: Students will understand the immigration process and gain empathy for immigrants seeking new opportunities in America.
The Quota Challenge
Recommended Age: 12–18
Activity Description: Students examine how the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924 affected immigration from different countries. They calculate how quotas limited immigration and analyze which groups were favored or restricted.
Objective: To understand how immigration quotas worked and how they changed immigration patterns.
Materials: Calculator, worksheets, census data charts, country cards.
Instructions:
Provide students with simplified quota charts based on historical data.
Assign students different countries and immigration requests.
Have students calculate how many immigrants would be allowed under the quota system.
Discuss which groups received larger quotas and why.
Encourage students to consider how these policies affected families and communities.
Learning Outcome: Students will understand the mechanics and consequences of quota-based immigration systems.
Debate the Immigration Act of 1924
Recommended Age: 13–18
Activity Description: Students participate in a structured debate representing different viewpoints from the 1920s. Roles may include immigrants, factory owners, labor union members, religious leaders, government officials, and nativist organizations.
Objective: To explore multiple perspectives surrounding immigration restrictions.
Materials: Role cards, note paper, historical background sheets.
Instructions:
Assign students a role from the 1920s.
Allow time for research and preparation.
Conduct a debate on whether immigration restrictions should be expanded or reduced.
Require students to support arguments using historical evidence.
End with a discussion comparing historical arguments to modern immigration debates.
Learning Outcome: Students will develop critical-thinking skills while understanding the complexity of historical policy decisions.
Family Immigration Timeline
Recommended Age: 10–18
Activity Description: Students create a timeline showing immigration events affecting one real or fictional family between 1880 and 1930. The timeline includes arrival, employment, citizenship efforts, immigration restrictions, and family reunification challenges.
Objective: To understand how immigration laws affected individual families over time.
Materials: Timeline worksheets, ruler, pencils, research materials.
Instructions:
Assign students a family background or allow them to create one.
Research major immigration events between 1880 and 1930.
Place those events on a timeline alongside family milestones.
Explain how each law or event affected the family.
Share completed timelines with the class or family group.
Learning Outcome: Students will connect national immigration policies to the real-life experiences of families.
Comments